Categorias
Erotic Websites username

Frequency product reviews was delivered uniformly along side level (Fig

Frequency product reviews was delivered uniformly along side level (Fig

Frequency

2A). Since examples, STETHOSCOPE (M = step one.333), EMPEROR (M = 1.407), and Palace (Yards = 1.579) were ranked among minimum https://datingranking.net/erotic-websites/ constant signs inside the ASL-LEX, and you can Liquid (Meters = six.963), You (Meters = six.889), and you can Me personally (Meters = 6.76) was in fact ranked one of the most regular signs.

We conducted a comparison of subjective frequency estimates from ASL-LEX and another independent dataset that used the same 1–7 rating scale for ASL signs, although the ratings were from deaf ASL signers residing in Canada (). We verified that a total of 297 items shared the same sign form in both datasets. The raw frequency ratings in the two datasets were moderately correlated (r s = 0.65, p < .001), suggesting good external validity. We also conducted a cross-linguistic comparison between raw subjective frequency estimates for a subset of 226 ASL and BSL signs from Vinson et al. (2008) that had translation equivalents in English (same rating scale). The results revealed a moderate correlation (r s = 0.52, p < .001), suggesting that signs expressing similar concepts in two different sign languages (evidenced by the same English translation) tend to receive similar frequency estimates. Using Fisher's r-to-z transformation, we found that the ASL-ASL correlation was stronger than the ASL-BSL correlation (z = 2.24, p = 0.0251). In addition, raw frequency ratings were moderately correlated with log10 word frequencies of their English translations from SUBTLEXYou (r s = 0.58, p < .001). The ASL-ASL correlation did not statistically differ from the ASL-English correlation (z = 1.69, p = 0.091).

Remarkably, Bates et al. (2003) discover comparable lexical regularity correlations among eight verbal dialects (Imply roentgen = .51; SD = .079), inside typologically varied languages like English and Mandarin Chinese (r = .53). Bates mais aussi al. (2003) hypothesize that the apparently higher texture from evaluations round the languages get getting pertaining to mutual cultural skills. This would be a most likely reasons to your discovering that within this a comparable language and you will/or culture (ASL-ASL; ASL-English), the latest correlation are more powerful than around the dialects and countries (ASL-BSL).